On March 30, Channel 5 officially turned 20. We’ve put away the bunting and birthday cake and, in a hungover daze, come up with the show’s most important contributions to the game show oeuvre over the past two decades.
If you caught a glimpse of the coverage, you obviously weren’t trying hard enough. The Guardian’s Tim Dowling describes the channel’s current output as ‘bollocks, benefits cheats and Big Brother’ – in a neat twist on former chief exec Dawn Airey’s ‘three Fs’ mantra (films, football, and you can guess the third one) – while Metro described the viewer experience as being ‘entertained, intrigued and, frankly, often quite bewildered’.
Discussion of individual shows will follow, but first is a graph ranking various Channel 5 game shows, in terms of viewability and innovation:
![c5final](https://gameshowgallery.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/c5final.png?w=584)
Note: shows which were essentially ‘formats poached from other channels with no deviation whatsoever’ are not included here, such as Robot Wars, Going for Gold, Big Brother, or Name That Tune. The reason is that it’s difficult to give a fair gauge in the innovation category. This graph is also not meant to represent an exhaustive analysis – it’s only a bit of fun, although feel free to agree/disagree in the comments section.
Definitely watching this
If you missed The Mole, then you missed out. The only reason it didn’t rank higher in the innovation category was that it came from a Belgian idea called, erm, De Mol. The premise was a golden one (and yes, that is a reference to its winning the Golden Rose of Montreux in 2000). 10 contestants take part, with one being eliminated each week until a winner emerged. Yes, it’s one of the earliest examples of the ‘balloon debate mechanism’ so loved by all today. But keep with it.
![themole2](https://gameshowgallery.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/themole2.jpg?w=584)
Host Glenn Hugill tells the contestants – who until this point had thought they were appearing on a show titled Adventure Challenge – via videolink what they’re in for
In reality, there were only nine contestants; the 10th, the Mole, was picked by the production team to be a double agent and scupper everyone else’s chances. The contestants take part in a series of games – with money at stake, albeit not for the faint hearted (bungee jumping, hostage negotiations and so on) – before at the end of each day they answer questions about who they think is the Mole. These questions range from those relating to the games to ones more generally examining the Mole’s personality traits. At the end of each exam, one contestant leaves – and of course the Mole stays through each week.
“These days, Channel 5’s output is more bollocks, benefits cheats and Big Brother than the three Fs”
Alongside the obvious playalong element – “it comes as a huge kick in the teeth as the person you suspected was the Mole gets eliminated and you have to reinvent all your theories”, as the UKGameshows reviewer put it – it was also nice that the Mole didn’t have any ulterior motive apart from putting a spanner in the works for all contestants. Unlike, say, Liar, where (part of) the aim of the game was for one of the stooges to walk away with £10,000.
It was a brilliant show. And there are some nice game show connections to boot. Glenn Hugill, the host, later of course helped create and produce Deal or No Deal for the UK market. Or, put another way, he was ‘The Banker’, a revelation to the mainstream media last year but to those in the know – not least the Manchester Evening News – was common knowledge for at least 10 years. Elsewhere, the connection between Endemol, Hugill’s employer for many years, and the De Mol name is just coincidental.
Solid but unspectacular
Putting Fort Boyard in this category does seem a little harsh, but bear with us. Yes, it was faithful to the French original (barring a couple of things). Yes, Leslie Grantham and Geoffrey Bayldon were great in their respective roles. Yes, it was a decent watch. But as the UKGameshows review put it: “Having seen the French version for a number of years you can’t help but watch it and think ‘they do that bit so much better in France.’” C’est la vie.
Otherwise, this section is populated by one sleepy daytime stalwart, one cult hit and one short-lived effort – with one original idea between them. Whittle, covered in chapter and verse by this publication already, was essentially Everybody’s Equal done on the cheap, while Win Beadle’s Money started off life as Win Ben Stein’s Money in the US.
100% – the sleepy daytime stalwart – ran for only four years, which felt surprisingly short to this correspondent. Yet it was good and solid enough, although Marcus Berkmann in his excellent book Brain Men wrote of the seemingly pointless nature of some of the questions. “Dull quiz shows, like Channel 5’s excruciating 100%, specialise in such questions,” he wrote. “Argentina is the world’s eighth largest country; true or false? In fact it’s true, but so what?” The contestants spoke even less than those on Fifteen to One – a name check at the start of the episode, the winner answering whether they want to come back again the next day (they always did) and that was your lot – and there wasn’t even a physical host, with Robin Houston doing the honours via v/o.
While many think the scandal around Ian Lygo’s 75 consecutive wins and then being booted off helped precipitate the show’s decline, the incident occurred in 1998, with the show finally departing in 2001. It probably didn’t help too much though, with the show’s producer admitting viewers were switching off because of his dominance. As the lights went down on Lygo for the last time, a cheery continuity announcer proclaimed: “And you may hear more about Ian’s amazing reign in tonight’s 5 News from 7.” 5 News, however, was having none of it, with Kirsty Young leading into their report thus: “After winning 75 shows on the trot, the programme makers finally found a way to get rid of him: they changed the rules.”
Throwing the TV out of the window
Alas, given the above, it may be fair to say that Channel 5’s contribution to the game show art is best remembered by these collection of shows, whether they are moments – Rebecca Loos masturbating a boar on The Farm – to the whole concept itself, with Naked Jungle. For the former, the idea of looking at the day to day life of farming was a lofty goal – the show apparently was not going to be a ‘balloon debate mechanism’ format at first – but it didn’t quite turn out that way. “It doesn’t help to see Vanilla Ice jumping on the back of a pig and riding it around or someone feeding croissants to ducks,” as one spokesman put it.
“It doesn’t help to see Vanilla Ice jumping on the back of a pig and riding it around”
As for the latter, while the stated aim, to celebrate naturism, was again reasonable, one got the impression it wasn’t ultimately why it ended up on screen. The programme was discussed in Parliament with soundbites along the lines of ‘considerable concern about some of the content on television’, and to make matters worse the show was ripped wholesale, set and all, from the kids’ favourite Jungle Run.
![touchthetruck](https://gameshowgallery.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/touchthetruck.jpg?w=584)
A promo ad for Touch the Truck; arguably more entertaining than the show itself
Yet at least Naked Jungle suited the televisual medium. The clue is in the ‘visual’ part of the word. You could see things moving about, if you’ll pardon the expression. Such movement was anathema to Touch the Truck, immortalised beautifully by the late, great Victoria Wood in one of her stand-up shows: “Now I’m probably making this sound more interesting than what it was…” But yes, that was it. 20 people touched a truck, being allowed very occasional breaks, and whoever was left standing at the end – after some three and a bit days – won it.
The finale summed up the whole show: the winner was an anti-car environmentalist who planned to sell the car to help fund his (unsuccessful) political career.
The future?
As previously mentioned, Channel 5 has had a reasonable amount of success reviving or taking other shows lock, stock and barrel; a hosting change here, a logo revamp there, and it’s as good as new. It’s safe to say Big Brother was well past its best by the time the fifth channel took it on, yet it remains one of its biggest hitters, and is the only game show present in the all-time top 10 ratings: 5.27 million viewers watched the opening episode of Celebrity Big Brother in August 2011.
This is evident in the channel’s latest venture in game show land: bringing back Blind Date. With what seems to be an inspired choice of host in Paul O’Grady – who of course was a very close friend of the late, great Cilla Black – all looks at first glance to be rosy in the garden. If only the GBP could remember the channel’s output with The Mole ahead of everything else, then it would be even better. “There may have been some high points in the channel’s 20-year history, but its reputation is indelibly associated with the low points,” explains Dowling. “No one remembers the nature documentaries; everybody remembers Keith Chegwin naked.”